Monthly Archive for October, 2008

Organised Atheism?

‘No God’ slogans for city’s buses

Bendy-buses with the slogan “There’s probably no God” could soon be running on the streets of London.

The atheist posters are the idea of the British Humanist Association (BHA) and have been supported by prominent atheist Professor Richard Dawkins.

The BHA planned only to raise £5,500, which was to be matched by Professor Dawkins, but it has now raised more than £36,000 of its own accord.

It aims to have two sets of 30 buses carrying the signs for four weeks.

The complete slogan reads: “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.”

As the campaign has raised more than anticipated, it will also have posters on the inside of buses as well.

The BHA is also considering extending the campaign to cities including Birmingham, Manchester and Edinburgh.

Professor Dawkins said: “Religion is accustomed to getting a free ride - automatic tax breaks, unearned respect and the right not to be offended, the right to brainwash children.

“Even on the buses, nobody thinks twice when they see a religious slogan plastered across the side.

“This campaign to put alternative slogans on London buses will make people think - and thinking is anathema to religion.”

Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the BHA, said: “We see so many posters advertising salvation through Jesus or threatening us with eternal damnation, that I feel sure that a bus advert like this will be welcomed as a breath of fresh air.

“If it raises a smile as well as making people think, so much the better.”

But Stephen Green of pressure group Christian Voice said: “Bendy-buses, like atheism, are a danger to the public at large.

“I should be surprised if a quasi-religious advertising campaign like this did not attract graffiti.

“People don’t like being preached at. Sometimes it does them good, but they still don’t like it.”

However the Methodist Church said it thanked Professor Dawkins for encouraging a “continued interest in God”.

Spirituality and discipleship officer Rev Jenny Ellis said: “This campaign will be a good thing if it gets people to engage with the deepest questions of life.”

She added: “Christianity is for people who aren’t afraid to think about life and meaning.”

The buses with the slogans will run in Westminster from January.

Source: BBC News

Also.

All aboard the atheist bus campaign

The atheist bus campaign launches today thanks to Comment is free readers. Because of your enthusiastic response to the idea of a reassuring God-free advert being used to counter religious advertising, the slogan “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life” could now become an ad campaign on London buses – and leading secularists have jumped on board to help us raise the money.

The British Humanist Association will be administering all donations to the campaign, and Professor Richard Dawkins, bestselling author of The God Delusion, has generously agreed to match all contributions up to a maximum of £5,500, giving us a total of £11,000 if we raise the full amount. This will be enough to fund two sets of atheist adverts on 30 London buses for four weeks.

If the buses hit the road, this will be the UK’s first ever atheist advertising campaign. It’s an exciting development, which I never expected when I first proposed the idea on Cif in June. Back then, I was just keen to counter the religious ads running on public transport, which featured a URL to a website telling non-Christians they would spend “all eternity in torment in hell”, burning in “a lake of fire”. When I suggested the atheist counter-slogan (now shortened for readability), the response was extremely positive, and hundreds of you pledged your support after the follow-up article.

As you read this, a new advertising campaign for Alpha Courses is running on London buses. If you attend an Alpha Course, you will again be told that failing to believe in Jesus will condemn you to hell. There’s no doubt that advertising can be effective, and religious advertising works particularly well on those who are vulnerable, frightening them into believing. Religious organisations’ jobs are made easier because there’s no publicly visible counter-view to refute their threats of eternal damnation.

The atheist bus campaign aims to change this. In addition to the slogan, the adverts will feature the URLs of secular, humanist and atheist websites, so that readers can find out more about atheism as a positive and liberating alternative to religion. We’ve also set up an interactive campaign website and Facebook group, so that questions raised by the adverts can be publicly debated.

CBS Outdoor, the bus advertising company, will run the atheist adverts in January if the funds are raised – but we need your help to make this happen.

Your donations will give atheism a more visible presence in the UK, generate debate, brighten people’s day on the way to work, and hopefully encourage more people to come out as atheists. As Richard Dawkins says: “This campaign to put alternative slogans on London buses will make people think – and thinking is anathema to religion.”

Source: The Guardian.co.uk

I’ve mixed feelings about organised Atheism; it seems a little… quixotic to begin veering into areas that are traditionally the reserve of religion. I’m all for raising awareness and prompting people to consider the various contradictions inherent to all major religions, but this seems a little, well, preachy. I’m not keen, no matter how amusing it is.

On a polit tip

When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, “This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,” the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, - not anything - you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.
Robert A. Heinlein, If This Goes On, Revolt in 2100

I apologise for the interminable fixation that appears to have taken hold of me, it’s just that I’m very angry about what our government is trying to do. No, it’s more than that, I’m angry, afraid, angry again, incredulous, furious, disbelieving, indeed a whole host of emotions that veer towards an outraged negative stance. I just can’t believe how willing they are to throw away huge chunks of our civil liberties.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

See, things are just getting silly now. I posted yesterday’s quote at least partially in jest, a snide observation on the ease with which populations can be manipulated by the odious shits in charge. Then I read this.

Passports will be needed to buy mobile phones

Everyone who buys a mobile telephone will be forced to register their identity on a national database under government plans to extend massively the powers of state surveillance.

Phone buyers would have to present a passport or other official form of identification at the point of purchase. Privacy campaigners fear it marks the latest government move to create a surveillance society.

A compulsory national register for the owners of all 72m mobile phones in Britain would be part of a much bigger database to combat terrorism and crime. Whitehall officials have raised the idea of a register containing the names and addresses of everyone who buys a phone in recent talks with Vodafone and other telephone companies, insiders say.

The move is targeted at monitoring the owners of Britain’s estimated 40m prepaid mobile phones. They can be purchased with cash by customers who do not wish to give their names, addresses or credit card details.

The pay-as-you-go phones are popular with criminals and terrorists because their anonymity shields their activities from the authorities. But they are also used by thousands of law-abiding citizens who wish to communicate in private.

The move aims to close a loophole in plans being drawn up by GCHQ, the government’s eavesdropping centre in Cheltenham, to create a huge database to monitor and store the internet browsing habits, e-mail and telephone records of everyone in Britain.

The “Big Brother” database would have limited value to police and MI5 if it did not store details of the ownership of more than half the mobile phones in the country.

Contingency planning for such a move is already thought to be under way at Vodafone, where 72% of its 18.5m UK customers use pay-as-you-go.

The office of Richard Thomas, the information commissioner, said it anticipated that a compulsory mobile phone register would be unveiled as part of a law which ministers would announce next year.

“With regards to the database that would contain details of all mobile users, including pay-as-you-go, we would expect that this information would be included in the database proposed in the draft Communications Data Bill,” a spokeswoman said.

Simon Davies, of Privacy International, said he understood that several mobile phone firms had discussed the proposed database in talks with government officials.

As The Sunday Times revealed earlier this month, GCHQ has already been provided with up to £1 billion to work on the pilot stage of the Big Brother database, which will see thousands of “black boxes” installed on communications lines provided by Vodafone and BT as part of a pilot interception programme.

The proposals have sparked a fierce backlash inside Whitehall. Senior officials in the Home Office have privately warned that the database scheme is impractical, disproportionate and potentially unlawful. The revolt last week forced Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, to delay announcing plans for the database until next year.

Source: Times Online

Suddenly it’s not so funny anymore.

Somwhat eerie

Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship. …voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.
Herman Göring, Nuremburg Trials, 1946

Isn’t the cyclical nature of history a curious thing?

23:20

Sometimes I’m consumed by a creeping doubt and, while you may not notice, it looms over me and colours my actions. It is the near certainty that I’m a terrible, terrible human being. My polarised way of thinking aside, this suspicion comes from the knowledge that, while I’m generally a polite and reasonable chap - albeit somewhat dark of humour - it’s often largely an act. I may courteously ask someone if I can squeeze past them, but the chances are that I’m thinking “get out of the fucking way, you tit. Why would you stand there and inconvenience the entire world when you could just as easily not exist? What the fuck is wrong with you; it’s an aisle, you don’t stand in the middle of an aisle and block it, you get out of the fucking way don’t you? Yes, yes you do. Move, move now. Go on, fuck off out of the way. God I hate you.”

All of which can make a man question himself. I mentioned this in passing to one of my friends along with my desire to live on a quiet little Scottish island with relatively few people about and a nice sense of remoteness. They advised me to seek help as being a hermit is just as unhealthy.

Fair point.

Come to us, or we’ll come to you

It is with increasing horror that I read the shite spouted by our leaders; they seem increasingly intent on grinding down civil liberties ‘for our protection’ before turning their new legislation against the very people it’s meant to protect. As a result, I read the following article with a single quote running through my mind, to whit;

“There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.”
George Orwell, 1984

Now, at risk of having to don a tinfoil hat and find a black helicopter, it seems that a descent into dystopia always starts with little steps. RIPA for example, was brought in by way of a misnomer in order to ‘make us safer’; our councils instead use it to spy on us. I realise it’s easy to sound like a paranoid delusional, but it’s the kind of behaviour that should worry you as much as it worries me. Anyway, read on.

Database would ’stop terrorists’

Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon has said that not monitoring mobile and web records would be “giving a licence to terrorists to kill people”.

In exchanges on BBC One’s Question Time he said terrorists used the internet to communicate with one another.

Mr Hoon said was prepared to go “quite a long way” to “stop terrorists killing people in our society”.

Lib Dem MP Julia Goldsworthy questioned how far civil liberties would be “undermined” by such a database.

Earlier the government confirmed the controversial plans would not be in the Queen’s Speech.

On Question Time, Mr Hoon said the plans would only extend powers that already exist for ordinary telephone calls, to cover data and information “going across the internet”.

He said the police and security services needed the powers to deal with “terrorists or criminals” using telephones connected to the internet, for “perfectly proper reasons, to protect our society”.

But the Lib Dems’ communities spokeswoman Julia Goldsworthy said it sounded like “something I would expect to read in [George Orwell's book] 1984″ and questioned whether the government and councils could be trusted not to misuse the powers.

She asked: “How much more control can they have? How far is he prepared to go to undermine civil liberties?”

Mr Hoon interjected: “To stop terrorists killing people in our society, quite a long way actually.

“If they are going to use the internet to communicate with each other and we don’t have the power to deal with that, then you are giving a licence to terrorists to kill people.”

He added: “The biggest civil liberty of all is not to be killed by a terrorist.”

The plans were condemned as “Orwellian” on Wednesday by the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives have called on the government to justify proposals for a giant database containing all internet and telephone traffic.

Details of the times, dates, duration and locations of mobile phone calls, numbers called, website visited and addresses e-mailed are already stored by telecommunications companies for 12 months under a voluntary agreement.

The data can be accessed by police on request but the government plans to take control of the process in order to comply with an EU directive and make it easier for investigators to do their job.

Information would be kept for two years by law and may be held centrally on a searchable database. The government had also promised new laws to protect civil liberties.

Shadow home secretary Dominic Grieve said pulling all the information together in a central server, to be managed by government, “represents a very profound change in the relationship between the state and the citizen”.

In a speech on Wednesday Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said a consultation would be held on the controversial plan in the New Year but did not say if it would be dropped from the Queen’s Speech which sets out the government’s legislative programme for the year ahead

However, on Thursday Commons leader Harriet Harman confirmed it would be delayed after calls in the Commons from the Conservatives and Lib Dems for a debate on the draft Communications Data Bill, in which it was due to be outlined.

She told MPs: “The draft communication bill was in the draft legislative programme and a number of issues and concerns have been raised about it.

“The home secretary makes it clear that at all times, on important issues such as these, she wants to listen to what people’s concerns are, she wants to consider those concerns, she wants to consult on a bipartisan and wide basis.”

On Wednesday Ms Smith attempted to reassure people that the content of their e-mails and phone conversations would not be stored and local authorities would not be able to trawl through looking for “lower level criminality”.

But the proposals came under fire from critics, including the government’s own reviewer of anti-terror laws, Lord Carlile, who said it would need “very strict controls”.

Source: BBC News

So, one more little step toward safety, one little database and terrorism will be banished for ever? Oh, ok then, as you’ve said all the magic words to make me panic and agree, why not? After all, I fucking love hyperbole and fear mongering, they’re the two things I’m most persuaded by. In fact, I’m convinced already.

So I’ll tell you what Mr Hoon, while I set about telling you where I am, what I’m doing, who I’m with, who I speak to, and about what, how about you fuck right off and mind your own business you insidious little shitrag?

Cheers.

Men at Work - Land Down Under

Travelling in a fried-out combie,
On a hippie trail, head full of zombie.
I met a strange lady, she made me nervous,
She took me in and gave me breakfast.
And she said;

“Do you come from a land down under?
Where women glow and men plunder?
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover.”

Buying bread from a man in Brussels,
He was six foot four and full of muscle.
I said, “Do you speak-a my language?”
He just smiled and gave me a vegemite sandwich
And he said;

“I come from a land down under,
Where beer does flow and men chunder.
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover. Yeahhh!”

Dying in a den in Bombay,
With a slack jaw, and not much to say.
I said to the man, “Are you trying to tempt me,
Because I come from the land of plenty?”
And he said,

“Oh, you come from a land down under? (oh yeah yeah)
Where women glow and men plunder?
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder? (ooohh)
You better run, you better take cover.”

Yes we are…

Livin’ in a land down under,
Where women glow and men plunder, (yeahhhhhhhhhh)
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder? (thunderrrrr!)
You better run, you better take cover.

Livin’ in a land down under,
Where women glow and men plunder,
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder? (oooo yeahhhh!)
Then I run, and then I take cover. (yea)

We are…

Livin’ in a land down under, (underrrr)
Where women glow and men plunder,
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder? (oooo da da laa yeahhh!)
Then I run, then I take cover.

You love it ^_^

News

Somewhat excitingly, all of the posts in the category Songs now have a video either embedded or linked. I’ve no idea if anyone actually bothers to investigate the songs or authors I post, but it’d be nice if you did, then you won’t be missing out.

The dangers of imagination

I’ve stated my conviction that there are more people in my head than just me on a few occasions now. Curiously, the whole concept is no longer a concern, not really, nor is it a particularly serious statement of worry; I think I may just be obsessed with the way consciousness works and the division between the conscious and subconscious mind. What with everyone’s mind working in different ways, I think it’s possible that I’m not actually unbalanced in any real sense; it’s just the case that mine works somewhat more differently than most. A part of me feels that that’s the worst sort of egotism, the idea that I’m in some way different or *ahem* ‘special’, but what’s a man to do?

Anyway, at best my concerns aren’t actually separate entities; they’re just various iterations of myself possessed, as it were, of a greater degree of independence than could reasonably be expected. I don’t know if anyone else has songs running through their head all day, or listens to stories told by yourself to yourself – only not quite – but I do, and it can be a little odd at times. Often there’s the sensation that it isn’t just me looking out on the world and there’s some sort of internal discussion going that I’m not privy to until a decision’s been reached.

That doesn’t make any sense does it? No, thought not. Still, this rambling nonsense has been prompted by the recent feeling that something isn’t quite right, y’know? Not with me, but a general sense of foreboding and the occasional flicker of memories that I’m not convinced belong in my head. There’s been an irritating monologue too, mumbling along and intermittently and drowning out the usual songs and stories, I think I object to that more.

Obviously, this is the most ridiculous delusional toss, but it does set me wondering about the intricacies of the human psyche and what other’s have to put up with, surely not everyone’s like this?

Traveller’s tales

I recently departed these sunny shores for climes less dreary, vistas more inspiring than the council offices over the road, and beers more enticing than our local brews. Yea, verily, after the success of last year’s trip to Bratislava, we wandered off to Budapest for geothermal baths, exquisite architecture and all the meat we could fit in our faces.

IMG_1585.JPGIMG_1603.JPGIMG_1594.JPGIMG_1600.JPG

Prior to that however, I spent a week in Yorkshire, an excursion that is the very polar opposite of going on the lash in a foreign capital. Behold! Spurn Head and the Wizard’s Tower.*

IMG_1583.JPGIMG_1576.JPGIMG_1578.JPG IMG_1605.JPGIMG_1632.JPGIMG_1606.JPG

Gallery: Spurn Head

*Well, Admiral Storr’s Tower.